As I mentioned last week, the Tanzania Human Development Report has a wealth of interesting data tables, many of which have data broken down by region for the first time. I plan to explore this data over the next few weeks. To start, I have prepared a dashboard showcasing the report’s data on gender.
Specifically, this includes two things:
1. Analysis by region:
- A Gender Development Index (GDI) score for each region of mainland Tanzania, based on the health, time spent in education, and living standards of women and men in each region. Along with the GDI score, I have included charts on each of the indicators that is used to calculate the GDI.
- Women in decision making positions, by region. This gives the percentage of each region’s MPs, councillors and key officials (RCs, RASs, DCs, DASs) who are female and male.
- You can choose which region to look at by selecting from the drop-down menu.
2. Analysis by indicator:
- This shows GDI and Human Development Index (HDI) scores for each region, by gender along with scores for the component indicators that make up the HDI, and representation of women in various decision making groups.
- Again, you can choose which indicators to look at using the drop-down menus.
Some quick conclusions:
- In three regions of central / western Tanzania, there are particularly large gaps between the development of women and men – Kigoma, Singida and Tabora.
- In most regions, the life expectancy for women is higher than for men. And in most regions there is very little difference between expected years of schooling for men and women. The difference in human development scores between men and women therefore come mainly from the difference in economic output.
- With a few exceptions, there is generally better representation of women among MPs than among other the groups of decision makers reported here.